Roulette Online PRO
LABEXPERIMENT 06df = 36α = 0.05seed 99

Wheel Bias

A biased wheel favors some pockets because of a physical defect: a loose fret, an uneven rotor, worn pockets. Biased wheels exist and have been exploited. The difficulty is that a perfectly fair wheel produces “hot numbers” constantly, so the question is never whether a number is hot, but whether the whole pattern is more lopsided than chance allows.

1. Sample a fair wheel

Spins drawn from a simulated wheel with no bias at all. Change the sample size and watch the hottest pocket.

0321519421225173462713361130823105241633120143192218297281235326
spins370
expected per pocket10.0
hottest pocket20 · 16 hits (4.32%)
hottest vs expected+60% · 1.9σ
chi-square · p32.8 · 0.622
verdictno evidence of bias

2. Observed vs expected

Each bar is a pocket in wheel order. The dashed line is the expected count, n/37. The shaded band is ±2 standard deviations: on a fair wheel about one pocket in twenty will poke outside it by chance alone.

0pockets in wheel order →26

3. Chi-square test

The test adds up how far every pocket is from expectation, squared and scaled. On a fair wheel the sum follows a chi-square distribution with 36 degrees of freedom; a p-value under 0.05 is conventionally called significant.

χ² = Σ (Oᵢ − Eᵢ)² / Eᵢ   Eᵢ = n/37   df = 36
n = 370 · E = 10.00 · χ² = 32.80 · p = 0.622
Sample-size warningBelow about 1,000 spins the test has almost no power to detect realistic biases, and a “significant” result at p < 0.05 will occur by chance in 1 of every 20 fair samples you look at. Testing many wheels, or re-testing the same wheel until it passes, guarantees false positives.

4. How many spins you would need

Spins required to detect one pocket hitting more often than 1/37, at a one-sided 5% level with 80% power. A pocket hitting 1 time in 35 instead of 1 in 37 would be a strong edge for a player, and it takes tens of thousands of recorded spins to confirm.

true rateplayer edgespins neededat 40 spins/h
1 in 25+44.0%1,10828 h
1 in 30+20.0%4,392110 h
1 in 33+9.1%15,747394 h
1 in 35+2.9%69,4611,737 h

Methodology

Sampling. Uniform draws from 37 pockets using a seeded generator (mulberry32, seed 99), so the page is reproducible.
Test. Pearson chi-square goodness of fit, 36 degrees of freedom, p-value from the regularized incomplete gamma function.
Power. Normal approximation to a one-proportion test, α = 0.05 one-sided, power 0.80.
Scope. Statistical detection only. Physical causes and sector-based (rather than pocket-based) analysis are covered in Sector Analysis.

Sources

  1. Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations… Philosophical Magazine, 50(302).
  2. Thorp, E. O. (1969). Optimal gambling systems for favorable games. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 37(3).
  3. Ethier, S. N. (2010). The Doctrine of Chances: Probabilistic Aspects of Gambling. Springer. Ch. 13, Roulette.